AGENTIX · WHAT WE BUILD / MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS SYSTEM TYPE / 2026
§ Solution · Operations · Incident Management · Research

Specialist agents, each with defined scope, collaborating across all your data sources.

When one agent is not enough. Multiple agents each own a domain, collaborate on complex diagnosis, and produce fully cited output, without a human analyst in the loop.

FIG.01, Multi-Agent Systems data flow
§01, When this fits

You have complex investigations that require specialist knowledge across multiple systems.

Some processes cannot be handled by a single agent because they span multiple domains, require cross-referencing multiple data sources, or involve competing hypotheses that need independent evaluation. These are the problems most AI tooling cannot touch.

We architect multi-agent systems where each agent owns exactly one domain, one data source, one diagnostic lens, one reasoning step. Agents collaborate through structured protocols, not free-form prompts. Read-only access is enforced at the framework level, not by prompt engineering.

Without it

Specialist investigates manually across StubHub Pro, MongoDB, source code. Hours per incident. Inconsistent write-ups. No reproducible evidence trail.

With it

Incident submitted. Agents cross-reference all data sources. Fully cited RCA posted to Azure DevOps. Analyst reviews evidence, does not gather it.

The approach

How we build it.

Every stage has a defined role and a quality gate before the next one runs, the same engineering spine under every Agentix system.

FIG.02, the build, stage by stage
01 Incident & Domain Mapping
02 Data Access Layer
03 Agent Orchestration
04 Eval Gate
05 Shadow Mode
06 Monitoring
  1. 01

    Incident & Domain Mapping

    We catalogue every incident type, every data source, and every diagnostic step. This defines the agent roster and their scope boundaries.

  2. 02

    Data Access Layer

    FastMCP tools for every external system, read-only, schema-validated. The Step Engine enforces this at framework level, not prompt level.

  3. 03

    Agent Orchestration

    Orchestrator assigns tasks, specialist agents execute, evidence is aggregated. Checkpoint loop re-opens investigation if confidence does not converge.

  4. 04

    Eval Gate

    Golden YAML fixtures capture known incidents with expected citations. CI blocks any PR that drops precision or increases calibration error.

  5. 05

    Shadow Mode

    New pipeline versions run in parallel with production, same incidents, outputs not delivered. Compare → validate → flip flag. No production risk from upgrades.

  6. 06

    Monitoring

    Per-tenant isolation verified continuously. Prometheus metrics, OTel traces, Langfuse on every multi-agent run.

§03, What you get

Delivered on
every engagement.

You own all of it, code, infrastructure and data, from day one. No licence fees, no hosted dependency.

  • Multi-agent architecture with specialist agents per data source or diagnostic domain
  • Read-only enforcement at the framework level, structural, not policy-based
  • CI regression gate with golden fixtures, blocks PR on precision drop or quality regression
  • Shadow mode deployment, new pipeline version validates against live incidents before traffic shifts
  • Per-tenant data isolation verified by integration tests on every build
  • Full observability, Prometheus metrics, OTel traces, Langfuse on every agent run
§ Stack

Open-source.
Self-hosted. Owned.

Built on components you can host, fork and extend. LiteLLM abstraction means you swap models without rewriting integrations.

CrewAIFastAPIFastMCPQdrantpatchrightAzure DevOps APIPrometheusOpenTelemetryLiteLLMLangfuseGitLab CI
Get started

Is this your
problem shape?

Describe what you're trying to do. We'll confirm whether this is the right system type, scope the build, and tell you what the eval harness looks like.

AGENTIX TECH · Multi-Agent Systems · eval-gated · observable · yours