ROI you can take
to the board.
Three tiers, Executive weekly, Team-Lead weekly, Developer monthly. The same four metrics at every altitude: lines shipped, token cost, $ per 1K lines, prompt quality. Claude writes the narrative of what was actually built, every figure carries an explicit confidence band, and none of it is a performance-review tool.
The team shipped 73,840 lines for $1,180 in tokens this week.
The top team shipped 18,140 lines over 7 active days, at the best cost ratio on the board.
~35% of weekly spend is recoverable, roughly $410/week, from a handful of low-context prompters.
4 of 14 active devs are over budget; one is showing burnout signals, 29% weekend, 22% late-night.
~5.5× output vs hand-coded cost, $1,180 of tokens against equivalent loaded labour.
Every report is answer-first and ends in an action. The data traces to the same per-developer ledger from Jaadu →, so the exec number and the developer number always agree.
73,840 LoC shipped for $1,180 in tokens.
~5.5× output vs hand-coded cost — spend framed against equivalent loaded labour.
- Who is winning
- Where money leaks
- Who needs help
- What's our leverage
Your team: 76,150 LoC at $10.20 / 1K LoC.
Best cost ratio in the org, plus a plain-English summary of what each engineer actually built.
- Top performer
- Best coaching ROI
- Who's at risk
- Team leverage
Your month: 38,420 LoC, prompt quality 7.4 → 7.9.
Personal growth, your best 10/10 prompt of the month, and one habit to save ~$120/mo.
- What you shipped
- What's working
- Two things to try
- Where you rank
high quality · low leverage Target zone
high quality · high leverage Manual drag
low · low Plausible nonsense
high leverage · low quality
NARRATIVE, Claude writes a plain-English account of what was actually shipped this period, not just the stats. Figures carry an explicit ±30% confidence band; this is decision support, not surveillance and not a performance-review tool.